Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Kelly Harris on December 18, 2008 at 8:21pm

Great post, we were waiting for it! We can add additional categories for services very easily. Take this opportunity what services you would like to see in our directory.

Kel :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kelly Harris on December 18, 2008 at 8:23pm

FYI - we just added the category "Transcription"

:) Kel

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Leigh Anne Aston on December 19, 2008 at 6:01am

What I'd like to see listed separately (that I don't see right now) is proofreading, desktop publishing, web site maintenance and internet research. Again, I'd also like to see a different skill level of Photoshop besides "Expert." And while I work with Adobe Acrobat, I have never created an e-book, so I don't feel comfortable checking the "PDF & eBook Creator" option. Thanks for listening.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kelly Harris on December 19, 2008 at 8:43am

Hi Leigh Anne, changed the title from "Services Provided" to "Skills" and added the categories you mentioned above. Thanks for the helpful feedback!

:) Kel

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Leigh Anne Aston on December 19, 2008 at 8:54am

Thanks, Kel. I noticed "Adobe" is listed as a skill-set. Is this supposed to be for all Adobe products (there are quite a few these days) or is this strictly for Acrobat?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kelly Harris on December 19, 2008 at 9:08am

Good question! I thought it might be better to keep it general, if we get too specific we could probably drill down into hundreds of skills. Let me know what you think as well.

I am doing some research this morning using Google and a few other tools I have to make this list as robust and specific as possible.

Please keep the feedback coming!

Kel :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Leigh Anne Aston on December 19, 2008 at 9:32am

I personally think Adobe is too broad -- Dreamweaver, Photoshop, Acrobat, Illustrator, Flash, InDesign, etc. These are all products that require specific skill sets unto themselves.

• ▶ Reply